lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:17:19 -0800 From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> Cc: carlo@...one.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM64: dts: Add support for Meson GXM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> writes: > Following the Amlogic Linux kernel, it seem the only differences > between the GXL and GXM SoCs are the CPU Clusters. > > Simply add a meson-gxm dtsi and reproduce the P23x to Q20x boards > dts files since the S905D and S912 SoCs shares the same pinout > and the P23x and Q20x boards are identical. Since the P23x and Q20x boards are identical, should we just come up with a singel dtsi for them all? e.g move the -p23x.dtsi to -pq2xx.dtsi or something? I don't think it's a big deal, but it does seem like we should avoid the copy/paste wherever possible. Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists