[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5C_=xNdkpcargLjysr9hkTAVAb6Hb8m5LpH62o0FQYZew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:39:23 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: Ksenija Stanojevic <ksenija.stanojevic@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Harald Geyer <harald@...ib.org>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] mfd: mxs-lradc: Add support for mxs-lradc MFD
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
>> +#define MXS_LRADC_BASE 0x80050000
>
> Just for my understanding, why is this hardware address hard-coded here?
> Shouldn't that be fetched from DT ?
Yes, this base address should be retrieved from device tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists