[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1479082447.644169869@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:14:07 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@...hat.com>,
"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
"Weston Andros Adamson" <dros@...marydata.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 037/152] nfs: don't create zero-length requests
3.2.84-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
commit 149a4fddd0a72d526abbeac0c8deaab03559836a upstream.
NFS doesn't expect requests with wb_bytes set to zero and may make
unexpected decisions about how to handle that request at the page IO layer.
Skip request creation if we won't have any wb_bytes in the request.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/nfs/write.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -747,6 +747,9 @@ int nfs_updatepage(struct file *file, st
file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name, count,
(long long)(page_offset(page) + offset));
+ if (!count)
+ goto out;
+
/* If we're not using byte range locks, and we know the page
* is up to date, it may be more efficient to extend the write
* to cover the entire page in order to avoid fragmentation
@@ -764,7 +767,7 @@ int nfs_updatepage(struct file *file, st
nfs_set_pageerror(page);
else
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
-
+out:
dprintk("NFS: nfs_updatepage returns %d (isize %lld)\n",
status, (long long)i_size_read(inode));
return status;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists