[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1479082460.120840025@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:14:20 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 118/346] sparc: serial: sunhv: fix a double lock bug
3.16.39-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
commit 344e3c7734d5090b148c19ac6539b8947fed6767 upstream.
We accidentally take the "port->lock" twice in a row. This old code
was supposed to be deleted.
Fixes: e58e241c1788 ('sparc: serial: Clean up the locking for -rt')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/tty/serial/sunhv.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sunhv.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sunhv.c
@@ -492,12 +492,6 @@ static void sunhv_console_write_bychar(s
locked = spin_trylock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
else
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
- if (port->sysrq) {
- locked = 0;
- } else if (oops_in_progress) {
- locked = spin_trylock(&port->lock);
- } else
- spin_lock(&port->lock);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (*s == '\n')
Powered by blists - more mailing lists