[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1479082447.664241533@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 00:14:07 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Eyal Itkin" <eyal.itkin@...il.com>,
"Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 144/152] firewire: net: guard against rx buffer overflows
3.2.84-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
commit 667121ace9dbafb368618dbabcf07901c962ddac upstream.
The IP-over-1394 driver firewire-net lacked input validation when
handling incoming fragmented datagrams. A maliciously formed fragment
with a respectively large datagram_offset would cause a memcpy past the
datagram buffer.
So, drop any packets carrying a fragment with offset + length larger
than datagram_size.
In addition, ensure that
- GASP header, unfragmented encapsulation header, or fragment
encapsulation header actually exists before we access it,
- the encapsulated datagram or fragment is of nonzero size.
Reported-by: Eyal Itkin <eyal.itkin@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Eyal Itkin <eyal.itkin@...il.com>
Fixes: CVE 2016-8633
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: fwnet_receive_broadcast() never matches IPv6 packets]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/drivers/firewire/net.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/net.c
@@ -677,6 +677,9 @@ static int fwnet_incoming_packet(struct
int retval;
u16 ether_type;
+ if (len <= RFC2374_UNFRAG_HDR_SIZE)
+ return 0;
+
hdr.w0 = be32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
lf = fwnet_get_hdr_lf(&hdr);
if (lf == RFC2374_HDR_UNFRAG) {
@@ -702,7 +705,12 @@ static int fwnet_incoming_packet(struct
return fwnet_finish_incoming_packet(net, skb, source_node_id,
is_broadcast, ether_type);
}
+
/* A datagram fragment has been received, now the fun begins. */
+
+ if (len <= RFC2374_FRAG_HDR_SIZE)
+ return 0;
+
hdr.w1 = ntohl(buf[1]);
buf += 2;
len -= RFC2374_FRAG_HDR_SIZE;
@@ -716,6 +724,9 @@ static int fwnet_incoming_packet(struct
datagram_label = fwnet_get_hdr_dgl(&hdr);
dg_size = fwnet_get_hdr_dg_size(&hdr); /* ??? + 1 */
+ if (fg_off + len > dg_size)
+ return 0;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
peer = fwnet_peer_find_by_node_id(dev, source_node_id, generation);
@@ -822,6 +833,22 @@ static void fwnet_receive_packet(struct
fw_send_response(card, r, rcode);
}
+static int gasp_source_id(__be32 *p)
+{
+ return be32_to_cpu(p[0]) >> 16;
+}
+
+static u32 gasp_specifier_id(__be32 *p)
+{
+ return (be32_to_cpu(p[0]) & 0xffff) << 8 |
+ (be32_to_cpu(p[1]) & 0xff000000) >> 24;
+}
+
+static u32 gasp_version(__be32 *p)
+{
+ return be32_to_cpu(p[1]) & 0xffffff;
+}
+
static void fwnet_receive_broadcast(struct fw_iso_context *context,
u32 cycle, size_t header_length, void *header, void *data)
{
@@ -832,9 +859,6 @@ static void fwnet_receive_broadcast(stru
__be32 *buf_ptr;
int retval;
u32 length;
- u16 source_node_id;
- u32 specifier_id;
- u32 ver;
unsigned long offset;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -852,17 +876,13 @@ static void fwnet_receive_broadcast(stru
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
- specifier_id = (be32_to_cpu(buf_ptr[0]) & 0xffff) << 8
- | (be32_to_cpu(buf_ptr[1]) & 0xff000000) >> 24;
- ver = be32_to_cpu(buf_ptr[1]) & 0xffffff;
- source_node_id = be32_to_cpu(buf_ptr[0]) >> 16;
-
- if (specifier_id == IANA_SPECIFIER_ID && ver == RFC2734_SW_VERSION) {
- buf_ptr += 2;
- length -= IEEE1394_GASP_HDR_SIZE;
- fwnet_incoming_packet(dev, buf_ptr, length, source_node_id,
+ if (length > IEEE1394_GASP_HDR_SIZE &&
+ gasp_specifier_id(buf_ptr) == IANA_SPECIFIER_ID &&
+ gasp_version(buf_ptr) == RFC2734_SW_VERSION)
+ fwnet_incoming_packet(dev, buf_ptr + 2,
+ length - IEEE1394_GASP_HDR_SIZE,
+ gasp_source_id(buf_ptr),
context->card->generation, true);
- }
packet.payload_length = dev->rcv_buffer_size;
packet.interrupt = 1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists