[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161114074609.GA22220@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:46:09 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATHCv10 0/2] USB Type-C Connector class
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:04:24PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 01:36:09PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:16:55PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > The USB Type-C class is meant to provide unified interface to the
> > > userspace to present the USB Type-C ports in a system.
> > >
> > Any idea what is happening with this patch series ?
> >
> > There was no further feedback (at least as far as I know), the series
> > seems to be ready to go, yet I don't see it in -next.
>
> I think Greg has only started to put together his usb-next branch for
> this cycle.
I was waiting to see if anyone else had objections about this before
reviewing it myself :)
I'll get to it later today...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists