[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161114075325.GA22639@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:53:25 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/34] 4.4.32-stable review
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:58:52PM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc boot: 139 boots: 1 failed, 136 passed with 2 offline (v4.4.31-35-g02bf66f6a361)
>
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.4.31-35-g02bf66f6a361/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.4.31-35-g02bf66f6a361/
>
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: local/linux-4.4.y
> Git Describe: v4.4.31-35-g02bf66f6a361
> Git Commit: 02bf66f6a36157b5a3b1040981a718b8e7e1662f
> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 36 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 16 builds out of 202
>
> Boot Failure Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.4.31-35-g02bf66f6a361&fail
>
> arm:
>
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
> at91-sama5d3_xplained: 1 failed lab
Well, at least it isn't 2 machines failing for this option :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists