[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c1e557a605312a4bf2a1feb44d940e9@walle.cc>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:50:02 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: "Y.B. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
yangbo lu <yangbo.lu@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: fixup PRESENT_STATE read
Am 2016-11-14 04:00, schrieb Y.B. Lu:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Walle [mailto:michael@...le.cc]
>> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 12:04 AM
>> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org; Ulf Hansson; Adrian Hunter; yangbo lu;
>> Michael Walle
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: fixup PRESENT_STATE read
>>
>> Since commit 87a18a6a5652 ("mmc: mmc: Use ->card_busy() to detect busy
>> cards in __mmc_switch()") the ESDHC driver is broken:
>> mmc0: Card stuck in programming state! __mmc_switch
>> mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
>>
>> Since this commit __mmc_switch() uses ->card_busy(), which is
>> sdhci_card_busy() for the esdhc driver. sdhci_card_busy() uses the
>> PRESENT_STATE register, specifically the DAT0 signal level bit. But
>> the
>> ESDHC uses a non-conformant PRESENT_STATE register, thus a read fixup
>> is
>> required to make the driver work again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
>> Fixes: 87a18a6a5652 ("mmc: mmc: Use ->card_busy() to detect busy cards
>> in
>> __mmc_switch()")
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - use lower bits of the original value (that was actually a typo)
>> - add fixes tag
>> - fix typo
>>
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-
>> of-esdhc.c
>> index fb71c86..f9c84bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_fixup(struct sdhci_host
>> *host,
>> return ret;
>> }
>> }
>> + /*
>> + * The DAT[3:0] line signal levels and the CMD line signal level is
>> + * not compatible with standard SDHC register. Move the
>> corresponding
>> + * bits around.
>> + */
>> + if (spec_reg == SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) {
>> + ret = value & ~0xf8000000;
>
> [Lu Yangbo-B47093] I think the bits which should be cleaned before
> following '|=' are 0x01f00000 not 0xf8000000, right?
> :)
Its neither 0x01f00000 nor 0xf8000000 :( I'll put the bits definition
into the comment the next time, so everyone can review them. bit[31:24]
are the line DAT[7:0] line signal level. bit[23] is command signal
level. All other bits are the same as in the standard SDHC PRESENT_STATE
register.
I want to keep all but the upper 9 bits from the original value,
therefore, this should be the correct mask:
ret = value & ~0xff800000;
-michael
>
>> + ret |= (value >> 4) & SDHCI_DATA_LVL_MASK;
>> + ret |= (value << 1) & 0x01000000;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> ret = value;
>> return ret;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists