| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1479119624.5295.144.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:33:44 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: tnhuynh@....com, Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Thang Nguyen <tqnguyen@....com>,
Phong Vo <pvo@....com>, patches@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: designware: Implement support for SMBus block
read and write
On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 09:56 +0700, tnhuynh@....com wrote:
> From: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@....com>
>
> Free and Open IPMI use SMBUS BLOCK Read/Write to support SSIF
> protocol.
> However, I2C Designware Core Driver doesn't handle the case at the
> moment.
> The below patch supports this feature.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@....com>
> ---
> Change from V3:
> - Correct coding conventions
> - Make clean
> Change from V2:
> - Change subject of email
> - Add a helper function to handle
> length byte receiving
> Change from V1:
> - Remove empty lines
> - Add flags variable to make clean code
> - Change DW_DEFAULT_FUNCTIONALITY
> in i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c | 46
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c | 1 +
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> index 1fe93c4..c91d1b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> @@ -543,6 +543,8 @@ static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev
> *dev)
> intr_mask = DW_IC_INTR_DEFAULT_MASK;
>
> for (; dev->msg_write_idx < dev->msgs_num; dev-
> >msg_write_idx++) {
> + u32 flags = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags;
> +
> /*
> * if target address has changed, we need to
> * reprogram the target address in the i2c
> @@ -588,8 +590,15 @@ static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev
> *dev)
> * detected from the registers so we set it
> always
> * when writing/reading the last byte.
> */
> +
> + /*
> + * i2c-core.c always sets the buffer length
> of
> + * I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA to 1. The length
> will
> + * be adjusted when receiving the first byte.
> + * Thus we can't stop the transaction here.
> + */
> if (dev->msg_write_idx == dev->msgs_num - 1
> &&
> - buf_len == 1)
> + buf_len == 1 && !(flags &
> I2C_M_RECV_LEN))
> cmd |= BIT(9);
>
> if (need_restart) {
> @@ -614,7 +623,12 @@ static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev
> *dev)
> dev->tx_buf = buf;
> dev->tx_buf_len = buf_len;
>
> - if (buf_len > 0) {
> + /*
> + * Because we don't know the buffer length in the
> + * I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA case, we can't stop
> + * the transaction here.
> + */
> + if (buf_len > 0 || flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN) {
> /* more bytes to be written */
> dev->status |= STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS;
> break;
> @@ -635,6 +649,24 @@ static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev
> *dev)
> dw_writel(dev, intr_mask, DW_IC_INTR_MASK);
> }
>
> +static u8
> +i2c_dw_recv_len(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, u8 len)
> +{
> + struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs;
> + u32 flags = msgs[dev->msg_read_idx].flags;
> +
> + /*
> + * Adjust the buffer length and mask the flag
> + * after receiving the first byte.
> + */
> + len += (flags & I2C_CLIENT_PEC) ? 2 : 1;
> + dev->tx_buf_len = len - min_t(u8, len, dev->rx_outstanding);
> + msgs[dev->msg_read_idx].len = len;
> + msgs[dev->msg_read_idx].flags &= ~I2C_M_RECV_LEN;
> +
> + return len;
> +}
> +
> static void
> i2c_dw_read(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> {
> @@ -659,7 +691,15 @@ static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev
> *dev)
> rx_valid = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_RXFLR);
>
> for (; len > 0 && rx_valid > 0; len--, rx_valid--) {
> - *buf++ = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
> + u32 flags = msgs[dev->msg_read_idx].flags;
> +
> + *buf = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
> + /* Ensure length byte is a valid value */
> + if (flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN &&
> + *buf <= I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX && *buf >
> 0) {
> + len = i2c_dw_recv_len(dev, *buf);
> + }
> + buf++;
> dev->rx_outstanding--;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> index 96f8230..8ffe2da 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct dw_pci_controller {
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE |
> \
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA |
> \
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA |
> \
> + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA |
> \
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK)
>
> /* Merrifield HCNT/LCNT/SDA hold time */
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index 0b42a12..886fb62 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE |
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA |
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA |
> + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA |
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK;
>
> dev->master_cfg = DW_IC_CON_MASTER | DW_IC_CON_SLAVE_DISABLE
> |
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists