lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:50:18 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     "pankaj.dubey" <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        horms@...ge.net.au, magnus.damm@...il.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
        vireshk@...nel.org, shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com, krzk@...nel.org,
        thomas.ab@...sung.com,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
        Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>, "cpgs ." <cpgs@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] ARM: scu: Provide support for parsing SCU device
 node to enable SCU

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:03:09PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, November 14, 2016 2:10:16 PM CET pankaj.dubey wrote:
> > >> +    scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > >> +    of_node_put(np);
> > >> +    if (!scu_base) {
> > >> +            pr_err("%s failed to map scu_base via DT\n", __func__);
> > > 
> > > For non-ca5, non-ca9 based SoCs, we'll see this error msg. We understand
> > > what does it mean, but it may confuse normal users. In current version,
> > > berlin doesn't complain like this for non-ca9 SoCs
> > > 
> > 
> > OK, let me see other reviewer's comment on this. Then we will decide if
> > this error message is required or can be omitted.
> 
> We need to look at all callers here, to see if the function ever gets
> called for a CPU that doesn't have an SCU. I'd say we should warn if
> we know there is an SCU but we cannot map it, but never warn on
> any of the CPU cores that don't support an SCU.

Maybe there should be two helpers:

of_scu_enable() which _only_ looks up the SCU address in DT and enables
it if it finds it, otherwise returning failure.

a9_scu_enable() which tries to use the A9 provided SCU address and
enables it if it finds it, otherwise returning failure.

Then callers can decide which of these to call, and what error messages
to print on their failures.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ