[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLG9OcJh63rUN0JcgcfB1cCj6riFJBPwZoWe0V-u9bh6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:57:53 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>,
He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/34] perf clang: Builtin clang and perfhook support
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com> wrote:
> This is version 2 of perf builtin clang patch series. Compare to v1,
> add an exciting feature: jit compiling perf hook functions. This
> features allows script writer report result through BPF map in a
> customized way.
looks great.
> SEC("perfhook:record_start")
> void record_start(void *ctx)
> {
> int perf_pid = getpid(), key = G_perf_pid;
> printf("Start count, perfpid=%d\n", perf_pid);
> jit_helper__map_update_elem(ctx, &GVALS, &key, &perf_pid, 0);
the name, I think, is too verbose.
Why not to keep them as bpf_map_update_elem
even for user space programs?
> SEC("perfhook:record_end")
> void record_end(void *ctx)
> {
> u64 key = -1, value;
> while (!jit_helper__map_get_next_key(ctx, &syscall_counter, &key, &key)) {
> jit_helper__map_lookup_elem(ctx, &syscall_counter, &key, &value);
> printf("syscall %ld\tcount: %ld\n", (long)key, (long)value);
this loop will be less verbose as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists