linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] kref improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161115072742.GA28248@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:27:42 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     keescook@...omium.org, will.deacon@....com,
        elena.reshetova@...el.com, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, dave@...gbits.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] kref improvements

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:39:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This series unfscks kref and then implements it in terms of refcount_t.
> 
> x86_64-allyesconfig compile tested and boot tested with my regular config.
> 
> refcount_t is as per the previous thread, it BUGs on over-/underflow and
> saturates at UINT_MAX, such that if we ever overflow, we'll never free again.
> 
> 

Thanks so much for doing these, at the very least, I want to take the
kref-abuse-fixes now as those users shouldn't be doing those foolish
things.  Any objection for me taking some of them through my tree now?

thanks,

greg k-h