lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <09f8fe694b4491bfd20272e8c7dc0f13f35eb34e.1479197311.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:53:22 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
        Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@....com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@...il.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: move slow path from workqueue to SCHED_FIFO task

If slow path frequency changes are conducted in a SCHED_OTHER context
then they may be delayed for some amount of time, including
indefinitely, when real time or deadline activity is taking place.

Move the slow path to a real time kernel thread. In the future the
thread should be made SCHED_DEADLINE. The RT priority is arbitrarily set
to 50 for now.

Hackbench results on ARM Exynos, dual core A15 platform for 10
iterations:

$ hackbench -s 100 -l 100 -g 10 -f 20

Before			After
---------------------------------
1.808			1.603
1.847			1.251
2.229			1.590
1.952			1.600
1.947			1.257
1.925			1.627
2.694			1.620
1.258			1.621
1.919			1.632
1.250			1.240

Average:

1.8829			1.5041

Based on initial work by Steve Muckle.

Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle.linux@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 68f21bb6bd44..f165ba0f0766 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -12,11 +12,14 @@
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
 
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <trace/events/power.h>
 
 #include "sched.h"
 
+#define SUGOV_KTHREAD_PRIORITY	50
+
 struct sugov_tunables {
 	struct gov_attr_set attr_set;
 	unsigned int rate_limit_us;
@@ -35,8 +38,10 @@ struct sugov_policy {
 
 	/* The next fields are only needed if fast switch cannot be used. */
 	struct irq_work irq_work;
-	struct work_struct work;
+	struct kthread_work work;
 	struct mutex work_lock;
+	struct kthread_worker worker;
+	struct task_struct *thread;
 	bool work_in_progress;
 
 	bool need_freq_update;
@@ -291,7 +296,7 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 	raw_spin_unlock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
 }
 
-static void sugov_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void sugov_work(struct kthread_work *work)
 {
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = container_of(work, struct sugov_policy, work);
 
@@ -308,7 +313,21 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
 
 	sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
-	schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &sg_policy->work);
+
+	/*
+	 * For Real Time and Deadline tasks, schedutil governor shoots the
+	 * frequency to maximum. And special care must be taken to ensure that
+	 * this kthread doesn't result in that.
+	 *
+	 * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
+	 * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() and before that schedutil
+	 * rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
+	 *
+	 * Though there is a very rare case where the RT thread yields right
+	 * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are
+	 * neglected for now.
+	 */
+	kthread_queue_work(&sg_policy->worker, &sg_policy->work);
 }
 
 /************************** sysfs interface ************************/
@@ -372,7 +391,6 @@ static struct sugov_policy *sugov_policy_alloc(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	sg_policy->policy = policy;
 	init_irq_work(&sg_policy->irq_work, sugov_irq_work);
-	INIT_WORK(&sg_policy->work, sugov_work);
 	mutex_init(&sg_policy->work_lock);
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&sg_policy->update_lock);
 	return sg_policy;
@@ -384,6 +402,51 @@ static void sugov_policy_free(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
 	kfree(sg_policy);
 }
 
+static int sugov_kthread_create(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+	struct task_struct *thread;
+	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_USER_RT_PRIO / 2 };
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* kthread only required for slow path */
+	if (policy->fast_switch_enabled)
+		return 0;
+
+	kthread_init_work(&sg_policy->work, sugov_work);
+	kthread_init_worker(&sg_policy->worker);
+	thread = kthread_create(kthread_worker_fn, &sg_policy->worker,
+				"sugov:%d",
+				cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus));
+	if (IS_ERR(thread)) {
+		pr_err("failed to create sugov thread: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(thread));
+		return PTR_ERR(thread);
+	}
+
+	ret = sched_setscheduler_nocheck(thread, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
+	if (ret) {
+		kthread_stop(thread);
+		pr_warn("%s: failed to set SCHED_FIFO\n", __func__);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	sg_policy->thread = thread;
+	kthread_bind_mask(thread, policy->related_cpus);
+	wake_up_process(thread);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void sugov_kthread_stop(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+	/* kthread only required for slow path */
+	if (sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled)
+		return;
+
+	kthread_flush_worker(&sg_policy->worker);
+	kthread_stop(sg_policy->thread);
+}
+
 static struct sugov_tunables *sugov_tunables_alloc(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
 {
 	struct sugov_tunables *tunables;
@@ -424,12 +487,16 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		goto disable_fast_switch;
 	}
 
+	ret = sugov_kthread_create(sg_policy);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_sg_policy;
+
 	mutex_lock(&global_tunables_lock);
 
 	if (global_tunables) {
 		if (WARN_ON(have_governor_per_policy())) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto free_sg_policy;
+			goto stop_kthread;
 		}
 		policy->governor_data = sg_policy;
 		sg_policy->tunables = global_tunables;
@@ -441,7 +508,7 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	tunables = sugov_tunables_alloc(sg_policy);
 	if (!tunables) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto free_sg_policy;
+		goto stop_kthread;
 	}
 
 	tunables->rate_limit_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
@@ -466,6 +533,9 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->governor_data = NULL;
 	sugov_tunables_free(tunables);
 
+stop_kthread:
+	sugov_kthread_stop(sg_policy);
+
 free_sg_policy:
 	mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
 
@@ -493,6 +563,7 @@ static void sugov_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
 
+	sugov_kthread_stop(sg_policy);
 	sugov_policy_free(sg_policy);
 	cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
 }
@@ -541,7 +612,7 @@ static void sugov_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	synchronize_sched();
 
 	irq_work_sync(&sg_policy->irq_work);
-	cancel_work_sync(&sg_policy->work);
+	kthread_cancel_work_sync(&sg_policy->work);
 }
 
 static void sugov_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ