[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161115084009.GB15734@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:40:09 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
will.deacon@....com, elena.reshetova@...el.com, arnd@...db.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, dave@...gbits.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] kref: Implement using refcount_t
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Provide refcount_t, an atomic_t like primitive built just for
> refcounting.
>
> It provides overflow and underflow checks as well as saturation
> semantics such that when it overflows, we'll never attempt to free it
> again, ever.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> include/linux/kref.h | 29 ++----
> include/linux/refcount.h | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
I'd suggest splitting this patch into two parts: first patch introduces the
refcount.h facility, second patch changes over struct kref to the new facility.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists