linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/debug: Dump more detailed segfault info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161115102201.wewvjts7uj2663pv@pd.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:22:01 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/debug: Dump more detailed segfault info

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:19:03AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Well, bfd8d3f23b51 was part of -rc1 already, so you have it too.

Right.

> What might have made the difference is that I tested it on real hardware with 
> serial logging, which delays printk() and might have created the race with the 
> systemd kernel logger. (Which is impossible to turn off :-( )

Of course it is!

printk.devkmsg=off

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.