linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:04:09 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
        Nate Watterson <nwatters@...eaurora.org>,
        Prem Mallappa <prem.mallappa@...adcom.com>,
        Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@....com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:36:12AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>> <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
>> > This patch series is v7 of a previous posting:
>> >
>> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/506
>>
>> I don't see anything objectionable in this series.
>>
>> Please let me know which patches in particular to look at in detail.
>
> Are patches 7 and consequently 16 (that builds on top of 7) ok with
> you ? They should be equivalent to nop on anything other than ARM64
> but they touch ACPI core so they require an ACK if they are ok please.

Yes, they are.  Please feel free to add my ACKs to those or I will
send them separately later today.

Thanks,
Rafael