lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161115150531.73jvxfclzzbtpfal@linux-x5ow.site>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:05:31 +0100
From:   Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
Cc:     "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset miscalculation

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:50:17PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 10:18 +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:04:43PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > I think the above code will miscalculate seconds_since_last_reset
> > > if 
> > > 'jiffies' wraps around after an lport has been created and before 
> > > seconds_since_last_reset is computed. Shouldn't
> > > seconds_since_last_reset 
> > > be computed as follows?
> > > 
> > > 	fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (jiffies - boot_time) /
> > > HZ;
> > 
> > But what happens when jiffies - boot_time becomes negative? Then we
> > reintroduce the bug again and have 'fcoeadm -s' show weird values.
> 
> Hello Johannes,
> 
> If your concern is about 'jiffies' wrapping around on 32-bit systems
> then you should use get_jiffies_64(). get_jiffies_64() - boot_time
> can't become negative. It namely takes several million years before a
> 64-bit HZ counter wraps around.

You're right. I'll respin using get_jiffies_64() and resent once it is tested.

Byte,
	Johannes

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@...e.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ