linux-kernel - [PATCH v13 06/22] vfio iommu type1: Update arguments of vfio_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1479223805-22895-7-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:59:49 +0530
From:   Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
To:     <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        <kraxel@...hat.com>, <cjia@...dia.com>
CC:     <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <jike.song@...el.com>,
        <bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v13 06/22] vfio iommu type1: Update arguments of vfio_lock_acct

Added task structure as input argument to vfio_lock_acct() function.

Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <cjia@...dia.com>
Change-Id: I5d3673cc9d3786bb436b395d5f74537f1a36da80
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 9f3d58d3dfaf..34d17e51dc97 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -150,17 +150,22 @@ static void vfio_lock_acct_bg(struct work_struct *work)
 	kfree(vwork);
 }
 
-static void vfio_lock_acct(long npage)
+static void vfio_lock_acct(struct task_struct *task, long npage)
 {
 	struct vwork *vwork;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 
-	if (!current->mm || !npage)
+	if (!npage)
+		return;
+
+	mm = get_task_mm(task);
+	if (!mm)
 		return; /* process exited or nothing to do */
 
-	if (down_write_trylock(&current->mm->mmap_sem)) {
-		current->mm->locked_vm += npage;
-		up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	if (down_write_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
+		mm->locked_vm += npage;
+		up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+		mmput(mm);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -170,11 +175,8 @@ static void vfio_lock_acct(long npage)
 	 * wouldn't need this silliness
 	 */
 	vwork = kmalloc(sizeof(struct vwork), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!vwork)
-		return;
-	mm = get_task_mm(current);
-	if (!mm) {
-		kfree(vwork);
+	if (!vwork) {
+		mmput(mm);
 		return;
 	}
 	INIT_WORK(&vwork->work, vfio_lock_acct_bg);
@@ -285,7 +287,7 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(unsigned long vaddr, long npage,
 
 	if (unlikely(disable_hugepages)) {
 		if (!rsvd)
-			vfio_lock_acct(1);
+			vfio_lock_acct(current, 1);
 		return 1;
 	}
 
@@ -313,7 +315,7 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(unsigned long vaddr, long npage,
 	}
 
 	if (!rsvd)
-		vfio_lock_acct(i);
+		vfio_lock_acct(current, i);
 
 	return i;
 }
@@ -328,7 +330,7 @@ static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(unsigned long pfn, long npage,
 		unlocked += put_pfn(pfn++, prot);
 
 	if (do_accounting)
-		vfio_lock_acct(-unlocked);
+		vfio_lock_acct(current, -unlocked);
 
 	return unlocked;
 }
@@ -390,7 +392,7 @@ static void vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
 		cond_resched();
 	}
 
-	vfio_lock_acct(-unlocked);
+	vfio_lock_acct(current, -unlocked);
 }
 
 static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
-- 
2.7.0