linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: check if table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3adcaa1f-6ded-0a56-2f44-c830e5a2d198@canonical.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:09:13 +0000
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
        "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, "Zhu, Rex" <Rex.Zhu@....com>,
        "StDenis, Tom" <Tom.StDenis@....com>,
        "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>,
        Nils Wallménius <nils.wallmenius@...il.com>,
        Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: check if table_info is NULL before
 dereferencing it

On 15/11/16 15:49, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Colin King [mailto:colin.king@...onical.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 7:55 AM
>> To: Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian; David Airlie; Zhu, Rex; StDenis,
>> Tom; Huang, Ray; Nils Wallménius; Baoyou Xie; dri-
>> devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: check if table_info is NULL before
>> dereferencing it
>>
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> table_info is being dereferenced before a null check, which implies
>> a potential null pointer deference error.  Fix this by moving the null
>> check of table_info to the start of smu7_get_evv_voltages to avoid
>> potential null pointer deferencing.
>>
>> Found with static analysis by CoverityScan, CID 1377752
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> NACK, this effectively reverts the patch.  This causes the function to exit early on asics where the table it NULL which is not what we want.  Whether the table exists or not is dependent on the table version and the feature caps for the chip which are checked before the table is dereferenced.  The NULL check in the top if clause is not strictly necessary and could be removed.
> 
> Alex

OK, understood.  The part I'm missing is that we dereference table_info
at the following statement:

if ((hwmgr->pp_table_version == PP_TABLE_V1)
    && !phm_get_sclk_for_voltage_evv(hwmgr,
                        table_info->vddgfx_lookup_table, vv_id, &sclk))

and later check if it is NULL. So, I can't see where table_info is being
set other than the start of the function, so, either it can be null and
hence we have a null ptr deference, or it's never null, in which case
the check for NULL is redundant.

Colin
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c | 6 ++----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c
>> index 28e748d..6798067 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c
>> @@ -1473,6 +1473,8 @@ static int smu7_get_evv_voltages(struct pp_hwmgr 
>> *hwmgr)
>>  			(struct phm_ppt_v1_information *)hwmgr->pptable;
>>  	struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_table *sclk_table =
>> NULL;
>>
>> +	if (table_info == NULL)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>
>>  	for (i = 0; i < SMU7_MAX_LEAKAGE_COUNT; i++) {
>>  		vv_id = ATOM_VIRTUAL_VOLTAGE_ID0 + i;
>> @@ -1483,8 +1485,6 @@ static int smu7_get_evv_voltages(struct pp_hwmgr
>> *hwmgr)
>>  						table_info-
>>> vddgfx_lookup_table, vv_id, &sclk)) {
>>  				if (phm_cap_enabled(hwmgr-
>>> platform_descriptor.platformCaps,
>>
>> 	PHM_PlatformCaps_ClockStretcher)) {
>> -					if (table_info == NULL)
>> -						return -EINVAL;
>>  					sclk_table = table_info-
>>> vdd_dep_on_sclk;
>>
>>  					for (j = 1; j < sclk_table->count; j++) {
>> @@ -1517,8 +1517,6 @@ static int smu7_get_evv_voltages(struct pp_hwmgr
>> *hwmgr)
>>  					table_info->vddc_lookup_table,
>> vv_id, &sclk)) {
>>  				if (phm_cap_enabled(hwmgr-
>>> platform_descriptor.platformCaps,
>>
>> 	PHM_PlatformCaps_ClockStretcher)) {
>> -					if (table_info == NULL)
>> -						return -EINVAL;
>>  					sclk_table = table_info-
>>> vdd_dep_on_sclk;
>>
>>  					for (j = 1; j < sclk_table->count; j++) {
>> --
>> 2.10.2
>