linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] tpm: cleanup/fixes in existing event log support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161115021543.d4wgjqid7fut4y4c@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:15:43 -0800
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@....de,
        tpmdd@...horst.net, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] tpm: cleanup/fixes in existing event log support

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:25:14PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:33:23PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:47AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > > This patch set includes the cleanup and bug fixes patches, previously
> > > part of the "tpm: add the securityfs pseudo files support for TPM 2.0
> > > firmware event log" patch set, in order to upstream them more quickly.
> > 
> > I applied the patches. I'm not yet sure whether these are part of the
> > 4.10 pull request or whether I postpone to 4.11 (my preference would be
> > 4.10 but I do not want to close that right now). I'll do testing next
> > week before doing pull request.
> > 
> > I hope that the commits gets some reviews and testing now that they are
> > easily testable in my master branch.
> 
> Event log still works and they do not seem to break TPM 2.0 (tried both
> machine with tpm_crb and tpm_tis).
> 
> Stefan: would you mind check that these do not break your TPM 1.2
> environment? I already tried wih TPM 1.2 machine but probably would
> make sense to peer test.

I'm dropping commits 8/9 and 9/9 from my tree and *will not* include
them to my 4.10 pull request.

/Jarkko