[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161115181939.GB127180@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:19:39 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dedekind1@...il.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, tytso@....edu, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
david@...ma-star.at, wd@...x.de, sbabic@...x.de,
dengler@...utronix.de, mhalcrow@...gle.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/29] fscrypt: Allow fscrypt_decrypt_page() to function
with non-writeback pages
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:20:45PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> /**
> * f2crypt_decrypt_page() - Decrypts a page in-place
> - * @page: The page to decrypt. Must be locked.
> + * @inode: The encrypted inode to decrypt.
> + * @page: The page to decrypt. Must be locked.
Strictly speaking, it's not the inode itself being decrypted, but rather the
data associated with it. Could this be better expressed as something like
"The inode to which the page belongs"?
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists