[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvCKipVi2Ar_amt+rrL2YL47Aj_+VDq8pjhiDvqWZihQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:25:16 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Quorum Laval <quorum.laval@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ovl: use kernel facility for updating access time
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Quorum Laval <quorum.laval@...il.com> wrote:
> Use fsstack_copy_attr_atime() instead of direct assignement.
This one's correct, but what's the point?
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists