lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:34:22 +0100 From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition Am 16.11.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Christian Borntraeger: > No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since > the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is > s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield > in sched.h. > > Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> Looks good to me! Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists