linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c41d574c-c89e-e518-91bb-3acd701e5023@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:34:22 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition

Am 16.11.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since
> the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is
> s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield
> in sched.h.
>
> Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>

Looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

David