[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161116172424.GA9487@uda0271908>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:24:24 -0600
From: Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
CC: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>, <khilman@...libre.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: dts: da850: Add the usb otg device nodeg
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:06:51PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 November 2016 02:49 AM, Bin Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:16:02PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> >> On Thursday 03 November 2016 09:29 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote:
> >>> This adds the device tree node for the usb otg
> >>> controller present in the da850 family of SoC's.
> >>> This also enables the otg usb controller for the lcdk board.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts | 8 ++++++++
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts
> >>> index 7b8ab21..9f5040c 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts
> >>> @@ -158,6 +158,14 @@
> >>> rx-num-evt = <32>;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +&usb_phy {
> >>> + status = "okay";
> >>> + };
> >>
> >> As mentioned by David already, this node needs to be removed. Please
> >> rebase this on top of latest linux-davinci/master when ready for merging
> >> (driver changes accepted).
> >
> > Dropped this patch due to this comment.
>
> Bin, Please do not apply dts or arch/arm/mach-davinci patches. I have a
> bunch queued through my tree and more in pipeline and it will cause
> unnecessary merge conflicts in linux-next or at Linus.
Sure, I will drop this whole set, and only apply the musb patches in the
new v5.
>
> For future, I have asked Alexandre to send driver and dts patches as
> separate series so there is no confusion on who should apply.
I will keep in mind to ping other domain maintainers before applying
non-musb patches in future.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
Regards,
-Bin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists