lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-bfe130773862bb3a02cdc4d4c2169f7f0210a46b@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:48:55 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org, hch@....de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:irq/core] genirq/affinity: Take reserved vectors into account
 when spreading irqs

Commit-ID:  bfe130773862bb3a02cdc4d4c2169f7f0210a46b
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/bfe130773862bb3a02cdc4d4c2169f7f0210a46b
Author:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:12:58 +0100
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:44:01 +0100

genirq/affinity: Take reserved vectors into account when spreading irqs

The recent addition of reserved vectors at the beginning or the end of the
vector space did not take the reserved vectors at the beginning into
account for the various loop exit conditions. As a consequence the last
vectors of the spread area are not included into the spread algorithm and
are treated like the reserved vectors at the end of the vector space and
get the default affinity mask assigned.

Sum up the affinity vectors and the reserved vectors at the beginning and
use the sum as exit condition.

[ tglx: Fixed all conditions instead of only one and massaged changelog ]

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479201178-29604-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

---
 kernel/irq/affinity.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 17360bd..49eb38d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
 {
 	int n, nodes, vecs_per_node, cpus_per_vec, extra_vecs, curvec;
 	int affv = nvecs - affd->pre_vectors - affd->post_vectors;
+	int last_affv = affv + affd->pre_vectors;
 	nodemask_t nodemsk = NODE_MASK_NONE;
 	struct cpumask *masks;
 	cpumask_var_t nmsk;
@@ -87,7 +88,7 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
 	if (affv <= nodes) {
 		for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
 			cpumask_copy(masks + curvec, cpumask_of_node(n));
-			if (++curvec == affv)
+			if (++curvec == last_affv)
 				break;
 		}
 		goto done;
@@ -107,7 +108,8 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
 		/* Calculate the number of cpus per vector */
 		ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
 
-		for (v = 0; curvec < affv && v < vecs_to_assign; curvec++, v++) {
+		for (v = 0; curvec < last_affv && v < vecs_to_assign;
+		     curvec++, v++) {
 			cpus_per_vec = ncpus / vecs_to_assign;
 
 			/* Account for extra vectors to compensate rounding errors */
@@ -119,7 +121,7 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
 			irq_spread_init_one(masks + curvec, nmsk, cpus_per_vec);
 		}
 
-		if (curvec >= affv)
+		if (curvec >= last_affv)
 			break;
 	}
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ