linux-kernel - [PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d6b11e61-bfed-598b-b984-a6bdb24a2bbe@semaphore.gr>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2016 21:13:23 +0200
From:   Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency
 updates

The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.

Both increase and decrease happen at steps.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
  * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
  * (default), then we try to decrease frequency
  *
- * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
- * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
+ * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
+ * frequency
  */
 static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
-- 
2.7.4