linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1479327308.8455.215.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:15:08 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] X86: Removing inline decl on arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h.

On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 20:16 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Corcodel Marian wrote:
> >  Inline declarations suppress warning message from compiler but
> >  most of these functions was declared static and is not used local on file.
> 
> Huch? This is a header file and the functions are marked inline on purpose.
> 
> Can you please explain what you are trying to achieve and why you think
> that this is a good idea?

Corcodel Marian is a bot.
Do not bother Thomas. 
Total Waste of time.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg370788.html

https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg103775.html