lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161116213625.GA10368@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:36:25 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: GHES platform devices

Hi Huang,

7ad6e9435596 ("ACPI, APEI, Manage GHES as platform devices") added
platform devices so the GHES driver could be built as a module and
automatically loaded when needed.

Later, 86cd47334b00 ("ACPI, APEI, GHES, Prevent GHES to be built as
module") removed the ability to build GHES as a module.

Should we revert 7ad6e9435596?  It's inconsistent to handle GHES, but
not other error sources, as a platform device.  And having it as a
platform device probably puts gunk in sysfs that we don't need.

Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ