[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <582D445F.1050100@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:47:11 +0900
From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] list_debug: show address of prev and next when list_del corruption
is detected.
When list_del corruption is detected, the corruption may happen
because of the region of prev or next is destroyed. So, the
address of prev/next is useful to find the destroyer.
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
---
lib/list_debug.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
index 3859bf6..a9cbcdb 100644
--- a/lib/list_debug.c
+++ b/lib/list_debug.c
@@ -55,11 +55,11 @@ void __list_del_entry(struct list_head *entry)
"list_del corruption, %p->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%p)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
WARN(prev->next != entry,
- "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
- "but was %p\n", entry, prev->next) ||
+ "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, but was %p (prev=%p)\n",
+ entry, prev->next, prev) ||
WARN(next->prev != entry,
- "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
- "but was %p\n", entry, next->prev))
+ "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, but was %p (next=%p)\n",
+ entry, next->prev, next))
return;
__list_del(prev, next);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists