[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161117094103.GB21237@localhost>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:41:03 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/7] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix bad register access
in probe error path
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:33:18PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 08:35 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Make sure to resume the platform device to enable clocks before
> > accessing the CPSW registers in the probe error path (e.g. for deferred
> > probe).
> >
> > Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1008) at 0xd0872d08
> > ...
> > [<c04fabcc>] (cpsw_ale_control_set) from [<c04fb8b4>] (cpsw_ale_destroy+0x2c/0x44)
> > [<c04fb8b4>] (cpsw_ale_destroy) from [<c04fea58>] (cpsw_probe+0xbd0/0x10c4)
> > [<c04fea58>] (cpsw_probe) from [<c047b2a0>] (platform_drv_probe+0x5c/0xc0)
> >
> > Note that in the unlikely event of a runtime-resume failure, we'll leak
> > the ale struct.
> >
> > Fixes: df828598a755 ("netdev: driver: ethernet: Add TI CPSW driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> > index c6cff3d2ff05..5bc5e6189661 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> > @@ -2818,7 +2818,12 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return 0;
> >
> > clean_ale_ret:
> > - cpsw_ale_destroy(cpsw->ale);
> > + if (pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev) < 0) {
> > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
> > + } else {
> > + cpsw_ale_destroy(cpsw->ale);
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> > + }
> > clean_dma_ret:
> > cpdma_ctlr_destroy(cpsw->dma);
> > clean_runtime_disable_ret:
> >
>
> I think, wouldn't it be logically more simple to just keep CPSW PM
> runtime enabled during probe?
Indeed it would. I'll do that in a v2.
Thanks,
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists