[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161117103224.719039756@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:31:45 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 12/92] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm
4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
commit 922cc171998ac3dbe74d57011ef7ed57e9b0d7df upstream.
The current code doesn't even compile as somehow the inline assembly
can't see the register names defined as ARC_RTC_*
I'm pretty sure It worked when I first got it merged, but the tools were
definitely different then.
So better to write this in "C" anyways.
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arc/kernel/time.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/time.c
@@ -152,14 +152,17 @@ static cycle_t arc_read_rtc(struct clock
cycle_t full;
} stamp;
-
- __asm__ __volatile(
- "1: \n"
- " lr %0, [AUX_RTC_LOW] \n"
- " lr %1, [AUX_RTC_HIGH] \n"
- " lr %2, [AUX_RTC_CTRL] \n"
- " bbit0.nt %2, 31, 1b \n"
- : "=r" (stamp.low), "=r" (stamp.high), "=r" (status));
+ /*
+ * hardware has an internal state machine which tracks readout of
+ * low/high and updates the CTRL.status if
+ * - interrupt/exception taken between the two reads
+ * - high increments after low has been read
+ */
+ do {
+ stamp.low = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_LOW);
+ stamp.high = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_HIGH);
+ status = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_CTRL);
+ } while (!(status & _BITUL(31)));
return stamp.full;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists