linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.8 81/92] gpio: of: fix GPIO drivers with multiple gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161117103227.925323992@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:32:54 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 81/92] gpio: of: fix GPIO drivers with multiple gpio_chip for a single node

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>

commit c7e9d39831a31682285cc31ddf7dd06c0fe59138 upstream.

Sylvain Lemieux reports the LPC32xx GPIO driver is broken since
commit 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and
struct gg_data").  Probably, gpio-etraxfs.c and gpio-davinci.c are
broken too.

Those drivers register multiple gpio_chip that are associated to a
single OF node, and their own .of_xlate() checks if the passed
gpio_chip is valid.

Now, the problem is of_find_gpiochip_by_node() returns the first
gpio_chip found to match the given node.  So, .of_xlate() fails,
except for the first GPIO bank.

Reverting the commit could be a solution, but I do not want to go
back to the mess of struct gg_data.  Another solution here is to
take the match by a node pointer and the success of .of_xlate().
It is a bit clumsy to call .of_xlate twice; for gpio_chip matching
and for really getting the gpio_desc index.  Perhaps, our long-term
goal might be to convert the drivers to single chip registration,
but this commit will solve the problem until then.

Fixes: 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data")
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Reported-by: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>
Tested-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c |   14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -26,14 +26,18 @@

 #include "gpiolib.h"

-static int of_gpiochip_match_node(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
+static int of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
 {
-	return chip->gpiodev->dev.of_node == data;
+	struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec = data;
+
+	return chip->gpiodev->dev.of_node == gpiospec->np &&
+				chip->of_xlate(chip, gpiospec, NULL) >= 0;
 }

-static struct gpio_chip *of_find_gpiochip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+static struct gpio_chip *of_find_gpiochip_by_xlate(
+					struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec)
 {
-	return gpiochip_find(np, of_gpiochip_match_node);
+	return gpiochip_find(gpiospec, of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate);
 }

 static struct gpio_desc *of_xlate_and_get_gpiod_flags(struct gpio_chip *chip,
@@ -79,7 +83,7 @@ struct gpio_desc *of_get_named_gpiod_fla
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}

-	chip = of_find_gpiochip_by_node(gpiospec.np);
+	chip = of_find_gpiochip_by_xlate(&gpiospec);
 	if (!chip) {
 		desc = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 		goto out;