[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3145378.USf2WOPoV2@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:35:45 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Drop fixed 200 Hz timer requirement from Exynos platforms
On Monday, November 14, 2016 8:27:05 PM CET Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> @@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@ source kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> config HZ_FIXED
> int
> default 200 if ARCH_EBSA110 || ARCH_S3C24XX || \
> - ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
> + ARCH_S5PV210
> default 128 if SOC_AT91RM9200
> default 0
After further research, I've concluded that we should also drop the
settings for ARCH_S5PV210 and ARCH_S3C24XX here.
ARCH_S5PV210 behaves exactly like EXYNOS here, it has 32-bit timers
so there won't be any overflow with 100Hz.
For ARCH_S3C24XX, it the requirement was that HZ_100 could not
be used with the old arch/arm/plat-samsung/time.c code that would
overflow its 16-bit counter.
However, the new drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c configures
the clock divider to '50' instead of '6', so there is no longer
a 16-bit overflow before the 100Hz tick, it now overflows every
3.7ms for the typical 12MHz clock.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists