[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161117183541.8588-6-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:35:26 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rt@...uxtronix.de, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 05/20] hwmon/via-cputemp: Remove pointless CPU check on each CPU
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
The check loop for the cpu type is pointless as we already have a cpu model
match before that. The only thing which is not covered by that check would
be a smp system with two different cores. Not likely to happen.
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 16 +---------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
index ac91c07e3f90..5b9866b1b437 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
@@ -319,22 +319,8 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void)
goto exit;
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
- for_each_online_cpu(i) {
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i);
-
- if (c->x86 != 6)
- continue;
-
- if (c->x86_model < 0x0a)
- continue;
-
- if (c->x86_model > 0x0f) {
- pr_warn("Unknown CPU model 0x%x\n", c->x86_model);
- continue;
- }
-
+ for_each_online_cpu(i)
via_cputemp_device_add(i);
- }
#ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
if (list_empty(&pdev_list)) {
--
2.10.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists