lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161117190254.d4doghspvz6ma6x2@lukather>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:02:54 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: Only count TCON endpoints as valid outputs

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:37:31PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The sun4i DRM driver counts the number of endpoints it found and
> registers the whole DRM pipeline if any endpoints are found.
> 
> However, if the TCON and its child endpoints (LCD panels, TV encoder,
> HDMI encoder, MIPI DSI encoder, etc.) aren't found, that means we
> don't have any usable CRTCs, and the display pipeline is incomplete
> and useless.

If some node set as available is not probed, then yes, it does, but
I'm not really sure how it's a problem. Quite the opposite actually.

> The whole DRM display pipeline should only be registered and enabled
> if there are proper outputs available.

Unless I've misunderstood what you're saying, we could have the
writeback for example that would just need the display engine.

> The debug message "Queued %d outputs on pipeline %d\n" is also telling.
> 
> This patch makes the driver only count enabled TCON endpoints. If
> none are found, the DRM pipeline is not used. This avoids screwing
> up the simple framebuffer provided by the bootloader in cases where
> we aren't able to support the display with the DRM subsystem, due
> to lack of panel or bridge drivers, or just lack of progress.

The framebuffer is removed only at bind time, which means that all the
drivers have probed already. Lack of progress isn't an issue here,
since the node simply won't be there, and we wouldn't have it in the
component lists. And lack of drivers shouldn't be an issue either,
since in order for bind to be called, all the drivers would have
gone through their probe.

So I'm not really sure what it fixes.
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ