linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: hisi: add ARCH_MULTI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <114569cb-79ab-a46d-8582-6169f182a32c@hisilicon.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:03:42 +0800
From:   Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com>
To:     Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
CC:     wenpan <wenpan@...ilicon.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Marty Plummer" <netz.kernel@...il.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <howell.yang@...ilicon.com>, <jalen.hsu@...ilicon.com>,
        <lvkuanliang@...ilicon.com>, <suwenping@...ilicon.com>,
        <raojun@...ilicon.com>, <kevin.lixu@...ilicon.com>,
        <qinxiaojun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: hisi: add ARCH_MULTI_V5 support

Hi Wei，

On 2016/11/16 17:31, Wei Xu wrote:
> Hi Pan,
> 
> On 2016/11/16 8:56, wenpan wrote:
>> Hi Marty，
>> Does this confict with your patch？ If not，I hope this could be merged first.  Besides could you tell me the link to your related patch?
> 
> This is the link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9334743/
> 

Thank you for offering this.If I want to give some comments on Marty's patch,
what should I do?

For Marty's patch, I think there's no need to add specific config item ARCH_HIxxxx
for every chipset. Some existing chipsets depend on ARCH_HISI directly like Hi3519
and Hi3798CV200. If some options like ARM_GIC is removed from ARCH_HISI, this kind
of chipsets will must choose other place to select it. I suggest we should keep selecting
ARM_GIC under ARCH_HISI as Pan's patch do.

The code may be like this:

config ARCH_HISI
 	bool "Hisilicon SoC Support"
-	depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
+	depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5 || ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_MULTI_V7
 	select ARM_AMBA
-	select ARM_GIC
+	select ARM_GIC if ARCH_MULTI_V7
+	select ARM_VIC if ARCH_MULTI_V5 || depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6
 	select ARM_TIMER_SP804
 	select POWER_RESET
 	select POWER_RESET_HISI
 	select POWER_SUPPLY

What's your opinion?

Best Regards,
Jiancheng

>> On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
>>>> Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pan Wen <wenpan@...ilicon.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks ok. I've added Marty Plummer to Cc, he was recently proposing
>>> patches for Hi3520, which I think is closely related to this one.
>>> Please try to work together so the patches don't conflict. It should
>>> be fairly straightforward since you are basically doing the same
>>> change here.
>>>