[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN1PR21MB007739A54B36636114561FB4CBB00@SN1PR21MB0077.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:24:49 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...uxonhyperv.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/29] Improve radix tree for 4.10
From: Ross Zwisler [mailto:ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com]
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:17:01PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Please include these patches in the -mm tree for 4.10. Mostly these are
> > improvements; the only bug fixes in here relate to multiorder entries
> > (which as far as I'm aware remain unused).
>
> My DAX PMD patches use multiorder entries, and are queued for v4.10 merge:
That's great; the point that I was trying to make was that while there are indeed bug fixes in the patches, they're latent bugs because there are no current users in the tree. So there's no need to hurry up and get these fixes in, they can wait for 4.10. I don't think your patches will run into these bugs either because you don't use tags. I do think that Kirill's patches might hit them though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists