linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ARM64 LPC: Add missing range exception for special ISA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:22:46 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        will.deacon@....com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, xuwei5@...ilicon.com,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, minyard@....org, marc.zyngier@....com,
        liviu.dudau@....com, john.garry@...wei.com, zourongrong@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, kantyzc@....com,
        zhichang.yuan02@...il.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "zhichang.yuan" <yuanzhichang@...ilicon.com>, olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ARM64 LPC: Add missing range exception for special ISA

On Monday, November 14, 2016 11:11:11 AM CET One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > > It's not a safe assumption for x86 at least. There are a few systems with
> > > multiple ISA busses particularly older laptops with a docking station.  
> > 
> > But do they have multiple ISA domains? There is no real harm in supporting
> > it, the (small) downsides I can think of are:
> 
> I don't believe they x86 class ones have multiple ISA domains. But as
> I've said I don't know how the electronics in the older ThinkPad worked
> when it used two PIIX4s with some LPC or ISA stuff on each.
> 
> It works in DOS and unmodified Linux so I'm pretty sure there are no
> additional domains. Likewise the various x86 schemes that route some bits
> of ISA bus off into strange places work in DOS and don't have any
> overlaps.
> 
> yenta_socket handles PCI/PCMCIA bridging and routes a range of that flat
> ISA space appropriately to the card.

Right, that's what I had expected, so we still don't even
need to handle multiple ISA I/O address spaces for the
only known case of multiple ISA buses, though we may decide
to generalize the code like that anyway.

	Arnd