linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM) Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161118100700.GA7126@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:07:00 +0100
From:   "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Levy, Amir (Jer)" <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>
Cc:     Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>,
        "andreas.noever@...il.com" <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mario_limonciello@...l.com" <mario_limonciello@...l.com>,
        thunderbolt-linux <thunderbolt-linux@...el.com>,
        "Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
        "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        "Zhang, Xiong Y" <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>,
        "Jamet, Michael" <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
        "remi.rerolle@...gate.com" <remi.rerolle@...gate.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] thunderbolt: Introducing Thunderbolt(TM)
 Networking

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 08:48:36AM +0000, Levy, Amir (Jer) wrote:
> > BTW, it is quite a shame that the Thunderbolt firmware version can't 
> > be read from Linux.
> > 
> 
> This is WIP, once this patch will be upstream, we will be able to focus more
> on aligning Linux with the Thunderbolt features that we have for windows.

Why is this patch somehow holding that work back?  You aren't just
sitting around waiting for people to review this and not doing anything
else, right?  Is there some basic building block in these patches that
your firmware download code is going to rely on?

confused,

greg k-h