[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479472214.22212.21.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:30:14 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>, wsa@...-dreams.de,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com, Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] i2c: designware: Master mode as separated driver
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 11:19 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> - The functions related to I2C master mode of operation were
> transformed in a single driver.
> - The name of the i2c-designware-core.c had to be changed to i2c-
> designware-src.c to for the cmake to be able to correctly compile both
> modules into one
> - Common definitions were moved to i2c-designware-core.h
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-src.c | 252
> +++++++++++++++
Perhaps i2c-designware-common.c ?
> @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
> * ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> *
> */
> -
> -
No need to do that in this patch.
> #define DW_IC_CON_MASTER 0x1
> #define DW_IC_CON_SPEED_STD 0x2
> #define DW_IC_CON_SPEED_FAST 0x4
> @@ -32,6 +30,123 @@
> #define DW_IC_CON_RESTART_EN 0x20
> #define DW_IC_CON_SLAVE_DISABLE 0x40
>
> +/*
> + * Registers offset
> + */
> +#define DW_IC_CON 0x0
Okay, can we split this to move definitions and the rest?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists