[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12943.1479476971@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:49:31 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Enhanced file stat system call
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > Hmmm... Interesting question. Probably should. But you could be insane and
> > RAID an nbd and a local disk. Further, does NFS over a loopback device to
> > nfsd on the same machine qualify as root? What if that's exposing a local fs
> > on NBD? Perhaps I should drop 'REMOTE' for now. It sounds like something
> > that a GUI filemanager might find interesting, though.
>
> GUI file managers already try and guess some of this in order to decide
> whether to display icons off remote file systems.
>
> You could be insane but it's always going to be a hint and nothing more
> and if it can't be perfect then that just goes in the notes in the manual
> page.
I've dropped REMOTE, FABRICATED, KERNEL_API, NONUNIX_OWNERSHIP, HAS_ACL and
UNLISTED_DENTS for now. I'm keeping AUTOMOUNT as that seems fairly
straightforward - though I'm sure we can find someone to disagree! ;-)
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists