[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-34c535793bcbf9263cf22f8a52101f796cdfab8e@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 06:13:08 -0800
From: tip-bot for Florian Fainelli <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: [tip:irq/core] irqchip/bcm7038-l1: Implement irq_cpu_offline()
callback
Commit-ID: 34c535793bcbf9263cf22f8a52101f796cdfab8e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/34c535793bcbf9263cf22f8a52101f796cdfab8e
Author: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:17:35 -0700
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:17:22 +0100
irqchip/bcm7038-l1: Implement irq_cpu_offline() callback
We did not implement an irq_cpu_offline callback for our irqchip, yet we
support setting a given IRQ's affinity. This resulted in interrupts
whose affinity mask included CPUs being taken offline not to work
correctly once the CPU had been put offline.
Fixes: 5f7f0317ed28 ("IRQCHIP: Add new driver for BCM7038-style level 1 interrupt controllers")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Cc: jason@...edaemon.net
Cc: marc.zyngier@....com
Cc: cernekee@...il.com
Cc: jaedon.shin@...il.com
Cc: ralf@...ux-mips.org
Cc: justinpopo6@...il.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477948656-12966-2-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
index 353c549..c2662a1 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
@@ -215,6 +215,31 @@ static int bcm7038_l1_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
return 0;
}
+static void bcm7038_l1_cpu_offline(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ struct cpumask *mask = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d);
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ cpumask_t new_affinity;
+
+ /* This CPU was not on the affinity mask */
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
+ return;
+
+ if (cpumask_weight(mask) > 1) {
+ /*
+ * Multiple CPU affinity, remove this CPU from the affinity
+ * mask
+ */
+ cpumask_copy(&new_affinity, mask);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &new_affinity);
+ } else {
+ /* Only CPU, put on the lowest online CPU */
+ cpumask_clear(&new_affinity);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask), &new_affinity);
+ }
+ irq_set_affinity_locked(d, &new_affinity, false);
+}
+
static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
unsigned int idx,
struct bcm7038_l1_chip *intc)
@@ -266,6 +291,7 @@ static struct irq_chip bcm7038_l1_irq_chip = {
.irq_mask = bcm7038_l1_mask,
.irq_unmask = bcm7038_l1_unmask,
.irq_set_affinity = bcm7038_l1_set_affinity,
+ .irq_cpu_offline = bcm7038_l1_cpu_offline,
};
static int bcm7038_l1_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists