[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161118154748.GN3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:47:48 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/6] Improve the tracking of active utilisation
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:06:34PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> @@ -1074,6 +1161,14 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> + rq = task_rq(p);
> + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> + if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer)) {
> + sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
> + hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.inactive_timer);
> + }
> + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
Its a bit sad having to take rq->lock here...
Also, what happens when hrtimer_try_to_cancel() fails?
> +
> out:
> return cpu;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists