[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28abb42b-4a93-fbb0-d8bb-e6b82b2b992f@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:43:30 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Nate Watterson <nwatters@...eaurora.org>,
Prem Mallappa <prem.mallappa@...adcom.com>,
Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@....com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/16] drivers: iommu: arm-smmu: split probe functions
into DT/generic portions
On 18/11/16 16:00, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:29:32PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> Current ARM SMMU probe functions intermingle HW and DT probing
>> in the initialization functions to detect and programme the ARM SMMU
>> driver features. In order to allow probing the ARM SMMU with other
>> firmwares than DT, this patch splits the ARM SMMU init functions into
>> DT and HW specific portions so that other FW interfaces (ie ACPI) can
>> reuse the HW probing functions and skip the DT portion accordingly.
>>
>> This patch implements no functional change, only code reshuffling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
>> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> Tested-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>
> Although I'd also like Robin to have a look at this.
Sorry, I've been slow this week. Having finally got round to taking a
proper look, I swear this seems even tidier than the last version I
looked at closely. It doesn't break DT boot on my Juno, either.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>
> Will
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists