[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN1PR21MB00771B7E1F66DE0A62F2FDD7CBB00@SN1PR21MB0077.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:34:05 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...uxonhyperv.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 21/29] radix-tree: Delete radix_tree_locate_item()
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov [mailto:koct9i@...il.com]
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Matthew Wilcox
> <mawilcox@...uxonhyperv.com> wrote:
> > This rather complicated function can be better implemented as an iterator.
> > It has only one caller, so move the functionality to the only place that
> > needs it. Update the test suite to follow the same pattern.
>
> Looks good. I suppose this patch could be applied separately.
Yes, a number of these patches stand alone from each other and could easily be separated out.
I'm going to put your Reviewed-by: on the patches you've said "Looks good" to. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists