[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161118202000.GP1197@leverpostej>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:20:00 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: fu.wei@...aro.org
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, marc.zyngier@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
hanjun.guo@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
harba@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
graeme.gregory@...aro.org, al.stone@...aro.org, jcm@...hat.com,
wei@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
leo.duran@....com, wim@...ana.be, linux@...ck-us.net,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, tn@...ihalf.com,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, julien.grall@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 14/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Add GTDT
support for memory-mapped timer
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:49:07PM +0800, fu.wei@...aro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
>
> The patch add memory-mapped timer register support by using the
> information provided by the new GTDT driver of ACPI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index c494ca8..0aad60a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -1067,7 +1067,28 @@ CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(armv7_arch_timer_mem, "arm,armv7-timer-mem",
> arch_timer_mem_of_init);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT
> -/* Initialize per-processor generic timer */
> +static int __init arch_timer_mem_acpi_init(void)
> +{
> + struct arch_timer_mem *timer_mem;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + timer_mem = kzalloc(sizeof(*timer_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
Why do you need it zeroed? You don't clear it between iterations, so
either you don't need this, or you have a bug in the loop.
> + if (!timer_mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + while (!gtdt_arch_timer_mem_init(timer_mem, i)) {
Huh?
Why doesn't GTDT expose a function to fill in the entire arch_timer_mem
in one go?
There shouldn't be multiple instances, as far as I am aware. Am I
mistaken?
> + ret = arch_timer_mem_init(timer_mem);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(timer_mem);
> + return ret;
> +}
Regardless, arch_timer_mem is small enough that you don't need dynamic
allocaiton. Just put it on the stack, e.g.
static int __init arch_timer_mem_acpi_init(void)
{
int i = 0;
struct arch_timer_mem timer_mem;
while (!gtdt_arch_timer_mem_init(timer_mem, i)) {
int ret = arch_timer_mem_init();
if (ret)
return ret;
i++
}
return 0;
}
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists