[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161119092039.317576501@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:23:09 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 17/49] fib_trie: Correct /proc/net/route off by one error
4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
[ Upstream commit fd0285a39b1cb496f60210a9a00ad33a815603e7 ]
The display of /proc/net/route has had a couple issues due to the fact that
when I originally rewrote most of fib_trie I made it so that the iterator
was tracking the next value to use instead of the current.
In addition it had an off by 1 error where I was tracking the first piece
of data as position 0, even though in reality that belonged to the
SEQ_START_TOKEN.
This patch updates the code so the iterator tracks the last reported
position and key instead of the next expected position and key. In
addition it shifts things so that all of the leaves start at 1 instead of
trying to report leaves starting with offset 0 as being valid. With these
two issues addressed this should resolve any off by one errors that were
present in the display of /proc/net/route.
Fixes: 25b97c016b26 ("ipv4: off-by-one in continuation handling in /proc/net/route")
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Reported-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Tested-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -2455,22 +2455,19 @@ static struct key_vector *fib_route_get_
struct key_vector *l, **tp = &iter->tnode;
t_key key;
- /* use cache location of next-to-find key */
+ /* use cached location of previously found key */
if (iter->pos > 0 && pos >= iter->pos) {
- pos -= iter->pos;
key = iter->key;
} else {
- iter->pos = 0;
+ iter->pos = 1;
key = 0;
}
- while ((l = leaf_walk_rcu(tp, key)) != NULL) {
+ pos -= iter->pos;
+
+ while ((l = leaf_walk_rcu(tp, key)) && (pos-- > 0)) {
key = l->key + 1;
iter->pos++;
-
- if (--pos <= 0)
- break;
-
l = NULL;
/* handle unlikely case of a key wrap */
@@ -2479,7 +2476,7 @@ static struct key_vector *fib_route_get_
}
if (l)
- iter->key = key; /* remember it */
+ iter->key = l->key; /* remember it */
else
iter->pos = 0; /* forget it */
@@ -2507,7 +2504,7 @@ static void *fib_route_seq_start(struct
return fib_route_get_idx(iter, *pos);
iter->pos = 0;
- iter->key = 0;
+ iter->key = KEY_MAX;
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
}
@@ -2516,7 +2513,7 @@ static void *fib_route_seq_next(struct s
{
struct fib_route_iter *iter = seq->private;
struct key_vector *l = NULL;
- t_key key = iter->key;
+ t_key key = iter->key + 1;
++*pos;
@@ -2525,7 +2522,7 @@ static void *fib_route_seq_next(struct s
l = leaf_walk_rcu(&iter->tnode, key);
if (l) {
- iter->key = l->key + 1;
+ iter->key = l->key;
iter->pos++;
} else {
iter->pos = 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists