[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hwet4+rm+y=EX=K1G+x7G+qk0+un8X4K2dJ3QBTeNbttw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:49:46 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/dumpstack: make stack name tags more comprehensible
2016-11-18 18:46 GMT+01:00 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>:
> NMI stack dumps are bracked by the following tags:
>
> <NMI>
> ...
> <EOE>
>
> The ending tag is kind of confusing if you don't already know what "EOE"
> means (end of exception). The same ending tag is also used to mark the
> end of all other exceptions' stacks. For example:
>
> <#DF>
> ...
> <EOE>
>
> And similarly, "EOI" is used as the ending tag for interrupts:
>
> <IRQ>
> ...
> <EOI>
>
> Change the tags to be more comprehensible by making them symmetrical and
> more XML-esque:
>
> <NMI>
> ...
> </NMI>
>
> <#DF>
> ...
> </#DF>
>
> <IRQ>
> ...
> </IRQ>
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
I like that! I hope not too many tools rely on the old namings.
But dmesg isn't supposed to be a stable ABI anyway.
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists