lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161119172331.GA25098@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:23:31 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rt@...uxtronix.de,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [05/20] hwmon/via-cputemp: Remove pointless CPU check on each CPU

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:35:26PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> The check loop for the cpu type is pointless as we already have a cpu model
> match before that. The only thing which is not covered by that check would
> be a smp system with two different cores. Not likely to happen.
> 
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>

Applied to -next.

Thanks,
Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ