lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161119185732.GF22775@obsidianresearch.com>
Date:   Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:57:32 -0700
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:     Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, dledford@...hat.com,
        sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com, leon@...nel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband: remove WARN that is not kernel bug

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:22:42PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:24:37 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov said:
> > WARNINGs mean kernel bugs.
> > The one in ucma_write() points to user programming error
> > or a malicious attempt. This is not a kernel bug, remove it.
> 
> > -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ib_safe_file_access(filp)))
> > +	if (!ib_safe_file_access(filp))
> >  		return -EACCES;
> 
> In that case, wouldn't this be better?
> 
> 	if (!ib_safe_file_access(filp)) {
> 		printk_once("Process %d (%s) tried to do something hinky", pid, comm);
> 		return _EACCESS;
> 	}
> 
> so the sysadmin becomes aware of the malicious attempt?

Yes please

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ